Emotional Intelligence Cultural Intelligence And Diversity - Samples

Question: Discuss about the Emotional Intelligence Cultural Intelligence And Diversity. Answer: Introduction This essay will discuss on the three major assessments that has taken by two of my friends and me. The three tastes that have been taken is the Johari Window Model Test, Howard Gardners Basic Multiple Test and the Daniel Golemans EQ instrument. A critical analysis will be preceded after that which is primarily based on the results of the tests that has been done by my two close friends and me. There is a need to analyze the four quadrants of the Johari test that includes the open, unknown, hidden and the blind (Tirri, Nokelainen and Komulainen 2013). A further analysis of the different strengths and the weakness that is based on the survey has been done and this will help me further to improve myself and at the end the discussion will be done on the capabilities that I posses. This will help me to presume the work in a better way so that to become a global citizen. In the Howard Gardners Basic Multiple Intelligence Test, I got to know what my friends did not know about me. I realized that my intelligence is naturalistic and I am curious about the different things in my life as well as around my life. People did not know that I was independent and friendly and at the same time intelligent as well. In this report the Faade means the qualities that is not known to others and I was not aware that people did not known that I was a witty person. I have a great sense of humor and can be easily relied on. I have hardly broken trust of any one. I easily get nervous that may be considered as one of my major drawback and I need to overcome this with time so that it do not remain my weakness anymore. The people who are curious in nature often tend to involve themselves in matters of other people (Berland and Berland 2017). There are some qualities that I did not even know that includes the accepting ability, bold and brave. I did not know that I was caring , extrovert as well as energetic. I was always friendly and made new friends easily and it never took much time. In the tests of my friend one, it was clearly visible that the facade was being bold and brave. Very few people can be both brave and bold at the same time but those who can carry both of them will eventually succeed in their life soon (Mishar and Bangun2014). He is trustworthy as the test highly reflects that and can be adaptable to any of the situations that may have a critical view. These are some of the unknown facts that needs to be rectified with time. This test has made my friend understand the different aspects of his characteristic, one that was hidden and one that has not been surfaced due to some reasons (McKimm and Swanwick 2013). In the third part my friend 2 took this test and became well aware of himself that he was not previously. The qualities of my friend one often reflects that of friend two and both may be considered as the identical. The people will o ften find way their same self in one another, few qualities even matches (McKimm and Swanwick2013). We cannot deny the fact that all the people on earth are somewhat to some extent similar to one another. My friends and I went through the intelligence test in five aspects. These aspects include body, language, musical, nature and logic tests. I received a score for each of these intelligence. A score of more than 3 in any of the intelligence reflects that I am using these intelligence quite often in any kind of learning processes. The score of my kinesthetic intelligence is 3.86. I scored 3.71 in linguistic intelligence. My musical intelligence reflected a score of 3.29. In naturalist intelligence, I scored 3.29. Lastly, in logic or mathematical intelligence I scored 2.86. As, it can be seen that most of my scores are more than 3. Therefore, it can be said that these intelligence are used me by more often to learn and grasp things. My friend 1 underwent the intelligence test in five parameters. The parameters were intra personal intelligence, spatial intelligence, linguistic intelligence, musical intelligence and mathematical intelligence (Batool 2013). He scored 3.71 in intra persona l intelligence. In spatial intelligence, he scored 3.29. His score in linguistic intelligence was 3. In musical intelligence, his score was 2.86. Finally in mathematical or logical intelligence he scored 2.86. It can be seen that my friends score in musical and mathematical intelligence is low. However, in other parameters he could obtain an average score. It can be inferred that he uses intra personal, spatial and linguistic skills in grasping and learning things quite often (Kohut 2013). Friend 2 had gone through tests of musical, intra personal, linguistic, kinesthetic and interpersonal intelligence. He scored 3.43 in musical intelligence. His score in intra personal intelligence will be 3.43. In linguistic intelligence, his score was 3.29. His kinesthetic intelligence score was 3.29. Lastly, he scored 3.14 in interpersonal intelligence. His score in all the five parameters was above 3. This indicates that all these intelligence are used by my friend to learn things. My Friend 2s score is the best out of all three of us. The EQ Test that I have done has resulted below average and this has made me unhappy. My friend 1 too scored below average with a percentage of 85% and my friend 2 scored somewhat far better than both of us with an average EQ test of 100%. In the EQ tests has helped me understand the different prospects of the level of the EQ (Nickerson and Zodhiates2013). This test has helped me to understand my character in better way. There is a need to understand myself and help me to have a good outlook as well. These tests have helped me to understand my own self in a better way. Through this test I have realized that I need to understand things logically. This test has helped to understand few things and then to make them rectified and to come out as a better person was all my sole motif. There is a need to understand ones sole motif in order to sustain in this competitive world of rapid changes (Saxena 2015). There is a need to adapt with the different situations and to be smart and logical i n most cases but if one becomes naive and assertive then it will eventually become very tough for that person to survive in that organisation (Zeidner 2013). There is a need to ask questions always that will help to resolve ones doubt and drench ones thirst of curiosity. The major changes should be very outward and if there is any requirement of help then the experts, my friends and well wishers can come to resolve my problems and help me to overcome them. There is always a requirement of proper guidance. Conclusion From this essay it can be concluded that the topic was all about self analysis program. The three mentioned tests have helped me to understand my qualities that were once hidden but have been now known to me. These same tests have been done with both of my friends as well and have helped me understand them as well. The test has helped me to understand my positive and my negative sides and has helped me to understand my stand in this world and work as a global citizen. The Johari Window test became really very useful to understand my hidden and unknown facts. References Algiraigri, A.H., 2014. Ten tips for receiving feedback effectively in clinical practice.Medical education online,19(1), p.25141. Batool, B.F., 2013. Emotional intelligence and effective leadership.Journal of Business Studies Quarterly,4(3), p.84. Berland, A. and Berland, A., 2017. Using the Johari Window to explore patient and provider perspectives.International Journal of Health Governance,22(1), pp.47-51. Kohut, H., 2013.The analysis of the self: A systematic approach to the psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorders. University of Chicago Press. McKimm, J. and Swanwick, T., 2013. Assessing learning needs.Clinical Teaching Made Easy: A practical guide to teaching and learning in clinical settings, p.7. Mishar, R. and Bangun, Y.R., 2014. Create the EQ modelling instrument based on Goleman and Bar-on models and psychological defense mechanisms.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,115, pp.394-406. Nickerson, R.S. and Zodhiates, P.P. eds., 2013.Technology in education: Looking toward 2020. Routledge. Saxena, P., 2015. JOHARI WINDOW: An Effective Model for Improving Interpersonal Communication and Managerial Effectiveness.SIT Journal of Management,5(2), pp.134-146. Tirri, K., Nokelainen, P. and Komulainen, E., 2013. Multiple Intelligences: Can they be measured.Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling,55(4), pp.438-461. Zeidner, M., 2013. What we know about emotional intelligence.Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal,27(3).